And we believe right to life for people who haven't had a chance to do anything wrong.
On Feb 26, 2017 10:47 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have to clarify, that response I just made came across very shitty to > Jaime, was intended tongue in cheek. > > But releasing information about treason is not an issue initially for the > media, whistleblower programs are in place and nobody uses them, if they do > and they fail, then the press is fine, but it used to be the press would > investigate it, verify it where possible, now its a direct to the plate > scenario. Snowden needs to never come back, because he should be shot, he > never attempted a formal channel, and he had the tech prowess to dead man > switch an insurance data dump. > The leaker who got our seal killed needs blacksited and never seen again. > These leakers of everything just need a bullet in the head and their > bodies left for the raccoons. > > Yeah, I do bluff a lot in poker, mainly because I drink a lot and forget > how to play mid game. > > On Feb 26, 2017 10:22 PM, "Jeremy" <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Quite a slippery slope there. I think if they are leaking an attempt at > covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute > the person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the person who > leaked the attempt at covering it up. I don't think any of them deserves a > bullet. As a strong second amendment-supporting liberal, I find it hard to > grasp the quick rush to murder people from the political party that > supposedly champions a 'right to life'. Let me guess, you probably support > running over protesters in the streets too, right? > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release >> devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate >> they were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of >> leaks. So I don't think it's extreme at all. >> The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of work. Do >> you spit on veterans too? >> >> On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy" <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve. Those people who released the >> trivial BS deserve to die?? There is the far right, and then there is bat >> shit crazy. Where do you think you fall? >> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them >>> he killed during a "robbery" democrat style >>> >>> On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and >>>> friends...I agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally >>>> the truth about Roswell will be leaked ... >>>> >>>> On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This should have been taking place the first time sensitive >>>>> information leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure >>>>> place. >>>>> Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the >>>>> press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing >>>>> mechanisms >>>>> to go right to the media should earn a bullet >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the >>>>>> leaks. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza < >>>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn >>>>>>> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff >>>>>>> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> >> > >
