Now I'm starting to really get confused.
I physically changed the AF24, and now I can send 1500b ICMP Packets
through it with no loss and UDP BW Test is fine, but TCP BW Test will
connect but pass 0 traffic.
If I change the Edgepoint to send tagged traffic over the AF24, instead
of untagged to the Mikrotik on the other end. Everything is perfect.
Change it back to untagged, and Pings still go through, but no TCP Traffic.
The Original AF24 radio does not work Either tagged or Untagged, so I'm
pretty sure there is something wrong with it.
On 2/27/2017 4:05 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
I think this might be an issue between the Edgepoint and the
Airfiber. I set the Port on the Edgepoint on the same network as the
AF24 radio, and as I increase ICMP Packet size, I start to have more
and more packet loss to the radio itself.
This was a Brand New AF24, cable length is about 10' Showing 29DB SNR
on all cable pairs. However I'm realizing now that the radio plugged
into the Edgepoint does not give me a cable length, but the AF24 on
the other end does. I wonder if this is an older unit I ended up with
and there's some sort of Ethernet incompatibility. Reading through the
forums, there's a lot of posts about older AF24 units and MTU size
speculating that a hardware changed occurred somewhere along the line,
but never confirmed by UBNT.
Nate
On 2/27/2017 8:34 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
Nate,
For testing purposes....
Considering using the Traffic Generator vs the BW Test tool. (look at
the MT wiki for instructions).
With CCR1009, pay attention to which ports you are connecting to..
due to the switch chip in there, not all ports have 1g connection to
the CPU.
Avoid, bridge ports, change the default interface queue to
ethernet-defaut
you can also get more information out of the AF24, by connecting to
them via ssh/telnet and issuing emacstat command..
I am not sure about the Edgepoint or 16SG, if they provide enhanced
ethernet stats. (We like the netonix cause they show a lot more
details of ethernet stats, the MT will also do that when you look at
the ethernet stats via CLI)
All of these should be able to help you find the issue.
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 9:08:12 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF24 and Edgepoint Slow Speed in 1 Direction
Flow control is disabled in both the Edgepoint and the 16SG. I found a
CCR1009 with an SFP+ Port I can put on the 16XG to test to the X86 10G
card. Other than the Tik on the other end of the AF24 link, I don't
have any other Tik's directly connected to this setup.
On 2/26/2017 10:10 PM, Mitch Koep wrote:
Flow Control??
On 02/26/2017 06:31 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
I have a setup which I just Installed, and I'm trying to track down
no speed in 1 direction on the link, Not having much luck so far, so
I thought I'd ask. The AF24 is reporting full modulation. I can't
even maintain a winbox connection to the router.
RB1100X2 -> Copper to AF24
AF24 -> Copper to Edgepoint S16 -> 10G fiber to Edgeswitch 16XG ->
10G fiber to X86 Mikrotik with Dell KJYD8 Broadcom 10G card.
The Mikrotik to AF24 path is on the default Vlan1 on the 16XG and
Edgepoint S16.
Bandwidth Test results:
TCP BW test at 500mb+ from the RB1100X2 (cpu limit) to the X86
~2mb from the X86 to the RB1100X2.
UDP BW Test at 700MB from the RB1100X2 to the X86
X86 is transmitting 700mb, but the RB1100 is only receiving ~400mb
MTU on everything is set to 1518.
Open to any ideas of what to try.