Yea damnit On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, 10:43 AM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
> Marines want to be called Marines. They earned that right. > > Soldiers want to be called Soldiers. They also earned that right. > > I'm no paint huffing crayon-eater! ;) > > On Mar 1, 2017 9:40 AM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > Phew, lots of deleting. Have we passed this turd finally? > > Deep cleansing breath, in through the nose, slow out through pursed lips. > Repeat, repeat, ommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm > > I have wonder why Marines always want to be called Warriors when all the > other soldiers and sailors are OK with their titles? My son in law is a > Marine. He put on a uniform and shot bullets at enemies, same as the army > guys. > > > *From:* Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 28, 2017 6:21 PM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for > SEAL's death in Yemen raid > > There is a very large group of veterans who are fucking pissed that our > commander in chief said that we don't fight to win. Mattis is also pissed > his new boss called him a soldier. I love my retarted marine brothers and > sisters, and we take offense whenever some civvy doesn't know the > difference. > > That aside, with this raid being as botched as it was there were some > critical failures in both intelligence and decision making at the highest > level. Those units don't act unless they have very very very recent > (sometimes to the minute) info unless told otherwise. Several things went > wrong, no doubt, and some of that squarely falls on Trump. I don't care if > he's your guy or if he's not, I don't give a damn. The go call in this > instance was the wrong one. > > On Feb 28, 2017 7:10 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I never said all, I said all I know, limited to probably around fifty, > only one is lt colonel in airforce reserves so no high ranking, and only > two special forces limited to Rangers, the rest all being regular > personnel, so not a great representation of the WHOLE military, but given > the mindset amongst them I'd venture a guess without much apprehension that > they are a pretty good representation of the military overall. > > > On Feb 28, 2017 7:02 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > You think all military active and veterans like Trump? Wow....Trump was > right about one thing.. he could kill someone in Times Square, and you'd > say it okay....I don't get it ...My critical mind is trying to understand > this blind faith in him... Almost like Jim Jones...Damn.... > > On Feb 28, 2017 5:49 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can't go with that when it came to our capabilities and mission objectives > the last guy was mouth in chief. This admin didn't want any military plans > made public ever. > I'd like to think at the end of the day this was just a mission that > turned shitshow fast on its own. It is an insult to call it poor planning > considering that's saying the mission training over the last 3 months > wasn't taken seriously by the SEAL team. > I personally wouldn't be at all suprised if the community organizer in > chief had his minions leak the details. Or one of his antifa terrorist > friends still embedded in the administration did so. All to do what was > done, discredit the current administration. Every currently serving and > veteran military personnel I know, with hehe exception of Josh here, > supports trump and understands what went down in this mission was what it > was and wants the same as I do from the people responsible if there was a > leak. > Even their lost brother in arms brother is a seal and hasn't said > anything negative (though that may be a limitation of his status) > > > On Feb 28, 2017 6:35 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Might be simpler than that. Could just be a few idiots in the new admin > that don't know how to keep their traps shut. His Orangeness doesn't seem > to connect the dots very well himself. He thought the conversations that > Flynn was having with the Russians were a good thing. > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:25 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> > wrote: > > > Who benefits from the leak? > > 1. ISIS > 2. Enemies of Trump/GOP/USA > > ISIS probably did not leak to themselves. > > So what does that leave us with? > > Apply Occam's razor. > > *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:47 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for > SEAL's death in Yemen raid > > Exactly, thats why the dad didnt need to request an investigation, it is > being investigated > > He should have not addressed that during the softball interview and waited > til tonights address with a prepared speech > > but this is going to have a shit ton of fallout > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > The person to blame is the one that leaked details of the action to the > bad guys. > They walked into a setup. This was long planned under Obama. > > How do you not know that Obama did not leak it to make Trump look bad? Or > Hillary? > > Somebody in the know leaked it. > > He blamed our military. He is the Commander. Therefore he is blaming > himself irrespective of his words. > The guy certainly has no grace or class when it comes to things like > this. He needs a bit of “the buck stops here” but he is just the > opposite. > > *From:* Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:29 PM > *To:* Animal Farm > *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for > SEAL's death in Yemen raid > > https://news.google.com/news/ amp?caurl=http%3A%2F% > 2Fthehill.com%2Fpolicy% 2Fdefense%2F321614-trump- > appears-to-place-blame-on- generals-for-seal-killed-in- > yemen-raid%3Famp#pt0-72526 > <https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fpolicy%2Fdefense%2F321614-trump-appears-to-place-blame-on-generals-for-seal-killed-in-yemen-raid%3Famp#pt0-72526> > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > >
