There are other systems that should be able to get more bandwidth to a single customer, or even a few customers, but in terms of the overall bandwidth to as many customers as possible, I don't think anything comes close to the Medusa. That's not to say that it's necessarily the best system for any given situation, but if the goal is lots of 15ish meg customers, and quality is more important than cost, it's probably the way to go... but I haven't ever operated one either.
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 1:43 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > I will know more after my meeting in a couple weeks in Miami. I am > currently under the impression that it is giving the largest number of > people a decent level of service. I don’t know what they consider decent. > To me anything over 15 Mbps is gravy. > > *From:* Gino Villarini > *Sent:* Sunday, March 12, 2017 12:41 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450i medusa > > Whats the end game? Top throughput on 1 customer or top throughput on max > clients? > > From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com > > > Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > Date: Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 2:22 PM > To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > Subject: [AFMUG] 450i medusa > > I am still working on a system for Haiti. Will be visiting with them > later in the month. I believe the 450 medusa system is the best > recommendation as to number of higher bandwidth customers per AP. But I > have never operated one. And I know there are other vendors attempting to > take prize for highest speeds and throughput on a PMP system. > > Is there a better system? > How heavy can you load this system? > > > > *Gino Villarini* > President > Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 > >
