It's meant for SMB, where there really isn't any need to change t hose things.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Seth Mattinen" <se...@rollernet.us> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2017 11:23:24 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CISCO VLAN question On 4/8/17 9:04 AM, Paul Stewart wrote: > haha.. yeah and I’ll take something that is reliable too ;) > I bought a complete set of unifi stuff to see what it's all about. A security gateway, switch, and two access points. And while it is somewhat simple to set up it's very lacking in flexibility. Apparently I can dig in json files and command lines to do other stuff the UI can't do and maybe it will stick across provisionings or maybe not, but why would I bother with that headache? I'd rather just stick with Cisco in that case. But I can certainly see sticking a unifi system at a customer location where it's NAT everything super basic nothing fancy usage. ~Seth
