It's very possible, I've just never heard of an exploit that doesn't
actually require you to run the payload

- Josh

On May 23, 2017 12:22 AM, "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> that's like super old (not that wannacry is all that new)
> its amazing to me that malware is such a thing
> fuckballs stuxnet is still live
> are humans retarded?
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I don't know which one that you are talking about, but there is a much
>> more advanced exploit floating around. One of the infection methods is to
>> auto download a file when loading a web page... When the user opens the
>> folder, the windows handler that loads the file icon from inside the
>> program, which then silently transmits that users credentials to a remote
>> SMB server.
>>
>> Nasty stuff.
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> On May 23, 2017 12:03 AM, "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> lol, better not be another one
>>> just seems like this wannacry thing is way blown out of proportion, I
>>> haven't seen anything to indicate its any more virulent or invasive than
>>> the standard malware, just happens it did a targeted phish of known
>>> unprotected targets
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Jay Weekley <par...@cyberbroadband.net
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is this a new way of announcing your wife is having a baby?
>>>>
>>>> Steve Jones wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I not an absurd lack of hype over this on this list when every other
>>>>> list is popping off
>>>>> Am I the only one that sees this as similar to the whole UBNT mishap?
>>>>> don't follow standard practices, pay the price?
>>>>> I'm inclined to block the ports as a mechanism of being a good steward
>>>>> of the interwebs, but shouldn't I have already been dropping those? as an
>>>>> ISP
>>>>> I'm tempted to push OS migration, but shouldn't I have already been
>>>>> doing so as an IT services guy.
>>>>> I'm tempted to keep current patches, but shouldn't I have already been
>>>>> doing so?
>>>>> I have no expectation that none of my contact customers will not be
>>>>> impacted... by choices they made in our contract.
>>>>> This doesn't seem like its a NEW thing
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_sou
>>>>> rce=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>>> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-sign
>>>>> ature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-emai
>>>>> l&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>>>
>>>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to