I don't remember saying anything about fiber vs wifi. As for the  cheese, I
would argue yes. Those bonds don't magically pay themselves. They are paid
off of taxes, they have to show them segmented but still taxes pay them.

I have never seen a government service run as well as a privately run one.
At least as far as a true service that one pays for and expects some
service in return. Maybe others have a different experience.

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:31 AM <fiber...@mail.com> wrote:

> According to reports they are building a muni fiber network, not a Muni
> WiFi network. Is it also gubment cheese if they are borrowing money by
> bonding?
>
>
> Jared
>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017
> > From: "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
> > To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com>
> > Subject: [AFMUG] Muni WiFi
> >
> > I guess Coloradan's just can't get enough gubment cheese
> >
> > *Colorado*
> > *Fort Collins Ponders Build-Out of Its Own ISP Using Public Utilities*
> > Oftentimes, municipalities will partner with private ISPs to provide
> > internet service as a public utility. But one Colorado city—Fort Collins
> > <
> http://insidetowers.us7.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d1b803ea3d99f4c1c1335a213&id=0b96ba638b&e=cc20c00449
> >—is
> > considering a ballot initiative that would give it authority to develop
> its
> > own internet network through the city’s Light and Power Utility,
> > reports *Community
> > Networks.*
> >
> > The ballot initiative, which would be voted on this upcoming November,
> > would change the city charter to enable the Light and Power Utility to
> > provide internet service. It may also ask voters to consent to allowing
> > municipal bonds to fund the build-out of the network infrastructure,
> which
> > could cost an estimated $125 to $140 million.
> >
> > In 2015, the city’s partnership with the private, Canadian-owned company
> > Axia fell through, prompting the municipality to weigh other options for
> > providing a municipal-wide network. That same year, 83 percent of voters
> > chose to opt out of SB 152, which discouraged Colorado municipalities
> from
> > building out their own networks.
> >
> > Local public officials have cited this vote as a sign that residents
> favor
> > the build-out of a locally owned and operated network, provided through
> the
> > city government. City Council member Ross Cunniff told *Community
> > Networks* that
> > voters are more than ready. “When I talk to citizens, really the main
> > question on their minds isn’t ‘should we?’ It’s, ‘Why haven’t you gotten
> > around to do it yet?’”
> >
>

Reply via email to