Be the hero dude...fix it and move on..

On Jun 7, 2017 6:42 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> Helical resonator duplexers can be almost as good as quarter wave
> duplexers and much smaller.
>
> *From:* George Skorup
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 07, 2017 5:56 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Interference on a repeater at 149 MHz
>
> We have a local school district co-located with us on a water tower and
> they're complaining about noise on their input. I pretty much told them
> they're SOL until we need to add or replace cables since they're all in an
> 1-1/4" PVC. So we'll have to run temp cables up, rip all the cables out of
> the pipe and pull new ones. The village said we have to be in conduit. And
> we do have a couple cables in use that aren't shielded. They didn't offer
> to pay for it, so too bad.
>
> They're running a Kenwood repeater in an outdoor cabinet. Maybe 12U.
> Obviously that's not going to fit the proper large can cavity duplexer like
> a Sinclair. Plus they have >4.5MHz split, so no doubt that let them use a
> smaller rack-mounted duplexer.
>
> So I'd be curious to know what the setup is on this 149MHz repeater. Are
> they using a small crappy duplexer with a large split, too?
>
> On 6/7/2017 5:55 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>
> I don't think so. I am assuming they probably didn't install some
> connectors correctly. Unless they are using some extremely crappy gear the
> RF portions of all half decent repeaters are shielded very well. Unless
> they modified the repeater leaving some shielding off the connectors are
> the most likely source. I guess there could also be punctures or some such
> in the coax as well.
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:51 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Lewis.  You are assuming the VHF gear was properly installed...few folks
>> do right first time... someones laziness or lack of knowledge is another's
>> opportunity to make some cash
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2017 4:41 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone checked their connectors/connections between all RF points?
>>> Antenna to cable, cable to duplexer, duplexer TX/RX to repeater.
>>>
>>> Most of the time I have seen Two Way equipment either be interfered with
>>> or interfere with someone else it is a connector issue. The only other case
>>> I have seen issues should be able to be determined by an intermod study. I
>>> doubt it has anything to do with intermod. My bet is a faulty connector. I
>>> would assume it is the RX side so I would check the RX Repeater port to the
>>> RX port on the duplexer and then the rest of the connectors.
>>>
>>> Not saying it can't be the the CAT5, just that if all is good on the
>>> antenna system I haven't ever seen an issue and I have a lot of sites with
>>> both two way and 900, 2.4, and 5GHz operating on all kinds of speeds both
>>> POE and not.
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to