Will either of those protocols actually scale to a reasonable number
of nodes?
Jared
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017
From: "Gino A. Villarini" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] So Silicon Valley WISP startup gets $7M
investment?
With 60 ghz cheap radios and TRILL or SPB, I believe the multi
backhaul Mesh
coulee be feasible.
From: Af <[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]> on
behalf of
"[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]";
<[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>
Reply-To: "[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]";
<[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>
Date: Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 9:34 AM
To: "[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]";
<[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] So Silicon Valley WISP startup gets $7M
investment?
Years ago there was a product called, from what I remember, ClearMesh
that was
very cool. It had 3 FSO
links built into that automatically tracked and found new mesh sites.
It had an
ethernet port that could be
fed fiber or to a customer. Range was something like 200M and cost
~$7,000 each.
Could probably be done
a cheaper and more reliable with 24/60GHz. They were hyping it for a
couple
years and I think it only was
on the market for less then a year before they went belly up.
Gino A. Villarini
President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Robert
<[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]> wrote:I tried
to work
with an Orbi setup but the configuration was locked up against it's
own config
controls.. i.e. broken. It uses _All_ of the top and bottom of the
5 Ghz
spectrum and no way to move it's usage around.
On 6/24/17 7:41 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:Netgear Orbi does that with
4x4 MU-MIMO
and multiple radios. Spendy though.
- Josh
On Jun 24, 2017 9:26 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)"
<[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]
<mailto:[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>> wrote:
I agree with you.... I don't know how many times I've had to
explain to people why mesh doesn't work well. And have seen
numerous startups fail who think their magic routing voodoo will
make this work. It is one of those technologies which just
intuitively seems like should work, but doesn't for so many
different reasons.
At some point someone is going to build a multi-radio beamforming
system which will actually result in the promise of mesh being
fulfilled without actually using what I would call mesh. With
beamforming and distinct radios, one could conceptionally build a
dynamic point to point backhaul system.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Rory Conaway
<[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]
<mailto:[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>>
wrote:
So someone rediscovered mesh? Umm, yea. $7M down the tubes.
Rory
-----Original Message-----
From: Af
[mailto:[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]
<mailto:[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>] On
Behalf Of Faisal
Imtiaz
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2017 2:41 PM
To: [email protected][mailto:[email protected]]
<mailto:[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] So Silicon Valley WISP startup gets $7M
investment?
> They advertise 75 Mbps symmetrical service. What radio
will
do this?
All kidding aside, and while I am not going to specifically
comment on this particular story....
Having said that, you all should take a closer look at what
Kent
Urwiller has been doing with his WISP, using Mimosa Gear.
(Micro
Pops w/fat backhauls).
His posts with a great amount of details can be found in the
Mimosa Group and RF Elements group on Facebook.
Here is a small snippet from one of his recent posts.. "...
Pretty dang amazing really. We are seeing around 130-150 Mbps
on
a 40 MHz channel to each client thanks to 2.3 and C5c. .."
:)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518[tel:305 663 5518] x 232
<tel:(305)%20663-5518>
Help-desk: (305)663-5518[tel:(305)663-5518]
<tel:(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or
Email:
[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]
----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected][mailto:[email protected]]
> <mailto:[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>
> To: [email protected][mailto:[email protected]]
<mailto:[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2017 4:54:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] So Silicon Valley WISP startup gets
$7M
investment?
> "We use FCC-approved antennas that transmit data using 5
GHz
signals,
> similar to the radios in your wifi router, cell phone, or
iPad. These
> small antennas are installed at your home by professional
installers
> or through a simple self-setup process, then wired into
your
wifi router."
>
> They advertise 75 Mbps symmetrical service. What radio
will
do this?
>
> Good way to turn $7M into nothing.
>
>
> From: Gino A. Villarini
> Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2017 2:30 PM
> To: [email protected][mailto:[email protected]]
<mailto:[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>
> Subject: [AFMUG] So Silicon Valley WISP startup gets $7M
investment?
>
> Things that make you go ummï¿1Ž2
>
>
https://medium.com/@rquintini/the-lynchpin-of-the-future-8d3f8217a0ad[https://medium.com/@rquintini/the-lynchpin-of-the-future-8d3f8217a0ad]
<https://medium.com/@rquintini/the-lynchpin-of-the-future-8d3f8217a0ad[https://medium.com/@rquintini/the-lynchpin-of-the-future-8d3f8217a0ad]>
>
>
>
>
>
> Gino A. Villarini
>
> President Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto
Rico 00968
-- *Forrest Christian* /CEO//, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./
Tel: 406-449-3345[tel:406-449-3345] | Address: 3577 Countryside
Road, Helena, MT
59602
[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]
<mailto:[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]> |
http://www.packetflux.com[http://www.packetflux.com]
<http://www.packetflux.com/[http://www.packetflux.com/]>
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian[http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian]>
<http://facebook.com/packetflux[http://facebook.com/packetflux]>
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux[http://twitter.com/@packetflux]>
