No dice with this jumper either on 320. I'm going to start lighting fires here in a minute
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Pwr 1 48 > Pwr 2 24 > 1 320 > 2 320 > 3 ubnt > 4 fsk > Is this correct? The fsk won't power. But I think I have a syncpipe > parasitic up there > > On Jul 14, 2017 5:21 PM, "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> wrote: > > It's printed on the board towards the left. Both the 10/100 and GigE > versions have four jumpers per port. 10/100 jumpers are pins 4, 5, 7 & 8 > individually for the case of split-pair power like the 320 and 430. The > GigE version is pairs (1&2/3&6/4&5/7&8) and will most definitely not do > split-pair power without re-wiring the RJ45 at one end so that two wrongs > make a right. > > Yes, I was about 1/2 a second away from screwing up once. Set the jumpers, > put everything back together. Port 1 was set for 4-pair power and the 48VDC > bus. A 450i AP was going there. Everything got upside down and I almost > plugged a regular 450AP into port #1 until I realized my mistake before it > was too late. > > > On 7/14/2017 4:49 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > > packetflux poerinjector plus sync pinout for the jumpers. I have the > document of PoE Injector Diagrams, but it doesn't seem right because by > default these power cambium, but that not the jumper config. Pretty sure > its the wrong document, and with mixing 24 and 48 with three different > radio systems id prefer it be correct > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Here's my version 0.7 from 2012, I need to update it. >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Anybody have a current one, I don't think mine us, I'm using both inputs >>> for 3 different kinds of radios and I am not even sure on which way to >>> orient the board for the pins. I have 2 320s, a fsk 900, and a ubnt 24v >>> radio >>> >> >> > > >
