It's under warranty if you want to send it in. Just send the serial (s) to the cust...@packetflux.com address.
On Jul 14, 2017 9:02 PM, "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ended up being a bad board, was odd to cause the first site monitor was > bad too, packetflux gear is never doa, ill get them on the bench and figure > out what i broke to cause that > > On Jul 14, 2017 7:25 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" < > li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > >> That board must be a really early one. I think there was about 100 of >> each type which went out without jumper labeling for some reason I forget >> now.... >> >> I sure don't see anything wrong with those jumpers. Are you getting >> power lights on the injector? Do you have a base unit to look and verify >> that the power is on on all of those ports. >> >> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Pwr 1 48 >>> Pwr 2 24 >>> 1 320 >>> 2 320 >>> 3 ubnt >>> 4 fsk >>> Is this correct? The fsk won't power. But I think I have a syncpipe >>> parasitic up there >>> >>> On Jul 14, 2017 5:21 PM, "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> It's printed on the board towards the left. Both the 10/100 and GigE >>> versions have four jumpers per port. 10/100 jumpers are pins 4, 5, 7 & 8 >>> individually for the case of split-pair power like the 320 and 430. The >>> GigE version is pairs (1&2/3&6/4&5/7&8) and will most definitely not do >>> split-pair power without re-wiring the RJ45 at one end so that two wrongs >>> make a right. >>> >>> Yes, I was about 1/2 a second away from screwing up once. Set the >>> jumpers, put everything back together. Port 1 was set for 4-pair power and >>> the 48VDC bus. A 450i AP was going there. Everything got upside down and I >>> almost plugged a regular 450AP into port #1 until I realized my mistake >>> before it was too late. >>> >>> >>> On 7/14/2017 4:49 PM, Steve Jones wrote: >>> >>> packetflux poerinjector plus sync pinout for the jumpers. I have the >>> document of PoE Injector Diagrams, but it doesn't seem right because by >>> default these power cambium, but that not the jumper config. Pretty sure >>> its the wrong document, and with mixing 24 and 48 with three different >>> radio systems id prefer it be correct >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Here's my version 0.7 from 2012, I need to update it. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Anybody have a current one, I don't think mine us, I'm using both >>>>> inputs for 3 different kinds of radios and I am not even sure on which way >>>>> to orient the board for the pins. I have 2 320s, a fsk 900, and a ubnt 24v >>>>> radio >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* >> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> >> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> >> >>
