I think the Xerox are OEM Fujitsu because drivers for PCs show Xerox-Fujitsu on the floor standing 2 we have.
Jaime Solorza On Aug 10, 2017 1:01 PM, "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: > For what it’s worth, a friend of mine’s company does scanning on large > scale. They work with medical and legal outfits the most where they take > thousands and thousands of documents, scan them, and through their software > system created a fully searchable database application. Neat business > really …. > > Anyways, they use nothing but high end Fujistu scanners and swear by them > …. something like $4k a piece the units they are using but their more > economical units are supposed to be pretty good too especially if you’re > not doing many thousands daily kind of thing … > > Paul > > On Aug 10, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'll second the Fujitsu ScanSnap iX500 Wireless Desktop Scanner. We have > both it and 2 neats. While I like the simplicity of the neat scanners for a > couple of reasons the Fujitsu seems to scan anything you can cram in it > while the neat often refuses to scan a perfect piece of paper for some > mystery reason. > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017, 10:52 AM SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net> wrote: > >> I like my >> >> >> >> Fujitsu ScanSnap iX500 Wireless Desktop Scanner >> >> >> >> Auto feed, scans both sides, scans to PDF, straightens crooked scans, >> OCRs so fully searchable PDF. >> >> >> >> Adam >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 10, 2017 7:50 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Document scanners >> >> >> >> Any recommendations on these? There is a 5 year old thread I found where >> Neat and Fujitsu were recommended - nothing newer though. >> > >
