http://www.batswireless.com/qd/
Regards, Chuck On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > I dont think there is any WISP gear that supports seamless handoff. You > could look at ruckus, which would be a snap, and I think the CNpilot stuff > does it too. > I guess the first thing that would need defined is seamless. > > I think that Telrad, at one point touted multitower connectivity, that may > have been roadmapped, or my imagination. > > you could go old school ghetto fabulous and rim the lake with leaky coax, > that would be a hoot > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com > > wrote: > >> Expensive for one boat, but we use Wave Relay to do this. >> >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Putting aside the sub question and RF for the moment, I would suggest >>> creating a separate subnet shared across all three routers joined by EOIP >>> for just this specific case. If the 3 routers share an upstream this might >>> be the best place for the gateway for the subnet. This *should* let you >>> roam across them at least without completely losing the stream. There is >>> still rereg time. Of course, mobile protocols have this sort of thing built >>> in so WiMAX, as much as I dislike it, and LTE both make allowances for this >>> to different degrees. You will have to hope the rereg time doesn't exceed >>> the buffer. >>> >>> The SM's flipping back and forth would be a big killer I would think. >>> Boat hits waves, starts to rock, SM's start to flip back an forth between >>> AP's. Sounds like something I want my competition to support instead of me. >>> That is of course, unless there is just to much money at stake to resist. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:08 AM Craig House <cr...@totalhighspeed.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Stupid voice to text it should've said turn the Omni upside down. ?? >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> > On Sep 7, 2017, at 10:08, Craig House <cr...@totalhighspeed.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Turning on the upside down. ?? >>>> > >>>> > Sent from my iPhone >>>> > >>>> > > On Sep 7, 2017, at 09:58, Dave <dmilho...@wletc.com> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > Ok, either I am getting to old for these crazy challenges or I am >>>> subjecting my self to motivation I have not figured this one out yet LOL >>>> > > >>>> > > We have a large site seeing Boat that sits on one of our lakes >>>> which navigates north and south of the lake and some to the east. >>>> > > We have 3 towers that can easily see a majority of the lake. One >>>> tower can see most of the north end and the other 2 can see south and east. >>>> > > >>>> > > So the challenge is to provide a content streaming connection to >>>> this boat which moves slowly across the lake. >>>> > > My answer first was use an omni on 3Ghz but the omni has downtilt >>>> built in so thats a no go. >>>> > > The plan B was to use a 4 cluster of integrated subscribers to talk >>>> to the towers. >>>> > > The next question would be if these subs are able to move from one >>>> ap to the next. >>>> > > How would you connect them to a router IE:RB493G to provide a >>>> single seemless connection in the boat? >>>> > > >>>> > > Im open to anything at this point. Oh yeah there is a Mobile >>>> hotspot for failover. >>>> > > >>>> > > I think I know the answer but wanted to see what others would do. >>>> > > >>>> > > Thanks >>>> > > Dave >>>> > > >>>> > > -- >>>> > > <Vcard.jpg> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Carl Peterson >> >> *PORT NETWORKS* >> >> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=401+E+Pratt+St,+Ste+2553%0D+Baltimore,+MD+21202&entry=gmail&source=g> >> >> Baltimore, MD 21202 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=401+E+Pratt+St,+Ste+2553%0D+Baltimore,+MD+21202&entry=gmail&source=g> >> >> (410) 637-3707 >> > >
