Attenuation is attenuation whether it's LTE or WiFi or cans & string.
Why do you guys think Radio Mobile can't predict coverage for LTE?
------ Original Message ------
From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: 9/21/2017 10:09:22 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there.
I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side?
For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a
-80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70
RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise
without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in
modeling LTE.
Joe
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile
against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as
linkplanner?
