yeah, and it only does 2D modelling, so I'm not quite sure how its accurate on multipolarity antennas. I know its "just math" and "only as good as the data put in". I never could get super NLOS accurate results in RM for 320, I assume its because of the WiMAX magic and custom radio mites
Has anybody ever priced out one of these cellular modelling systems that you do 3D structure renderings into? My guess is its way outside a small WISP budget, like over 50k On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 9:17 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. I > have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am comfortable > with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am pretty proficient. > Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? > > *From:* Mitch Koep > *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > The one problem I have with towercoverage is > > the only monthly payment option is paypal. > > Credit card is by far safer. > > I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal > > IMO > > Mitch Koep > > On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > > It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data > rates on? > > On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" <dmburg...@linktechs.net> wrote: > >> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J >> >> >> >> Dennis Burgess >> >> www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 <%28314%29%20735-0270> – >> dmburg...@linktechs.net >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >> >> >> >> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. >> >> >> >> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote: >> >> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? >> >> >> >> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a >> -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It >> seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending >> loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Joe >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against >> existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
