+1 I could see that for sure.
But we could get into the area they are not and would not go much faster.


On 09/28/2017 07:35 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
It would mean cell cos get more federal funding. A lot more.

On Sep 28, 2017 12:37 AM, "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    I don't really see how redefining "broadband" to 10/1 is a bad
    thing... shouldn't that mean that other companies wouldn't (in
    theory, anyway) be able to get funding to overbuild areas where we
    are already providing 10mbps, which they currently could, unless
    we have at least 25mbps?

    On Sep 28, 2017 12:30 AM, "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
    <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        Off the topic, but we  have a customer who keeps trying to get
        our cs to ise the term broadband. Hes limited to 6x2 and
        thinks (semi correctly) he can fule an fcc complaint if they
        use that word. Hes also accused us of violating federal
        monopoly laws because we have an exclusive contract on the
        grain elevator in his town.
        If i could release emails, voicemails, and call recordings
        from this guy over thelast ten years, i would win the internet
        and nobody in this industry would ever hate a customer less.

        On Sep 27, 2017 10:05 PM, "Josh Reynolds"
        <j...@kyneticwifi.com <mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>> wrote:

            As a note to this...

            "As always, you're not going to be blown away by the
            performance.
            You're paying $60 per month for 10Mbps downloads and 1Mbps
            uploads,
            which doesn't meet the FCC's definition of broadband."

            https://twitter.com/JRosenworcel/status/910514607743217665
            <https://twitter.com/JRosenworcel/status/910514607743217665>

            "#FCC proposing to lower US #broadband standard from 25 to
            10 Mbps.
            This is crazy. Lowering standards doesn't solve our broadband
            problems."

            Why would they do such a thing?

            Oh, so they can get more of our tax dollars to roll out
            competition in
            your area. Funded by you.

            On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Steve Jones
            <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
            <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
            > Theyre replacing a tower here five feet from the current
            tower. I assume my
            > bosses taxes are helping to fund this.... assholes
            >
            > On Sep 27, 2017 6:50 PM, "Tushar Patel" <tpa...@ecpi.com
            <mailto:tpa...@ecpi.com>> wrote:
            >
            >
            
https://www.engadget.com/2017/09/27/att-rural-wireless-internet-expands-to-9-more-states/
            
<https://www.engadget.com/2017/09/27/att-rural-wireless-internet-expands-to-9-more-states/>
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >




--

Reply via email to