It seems a lot less cut and dried with wireless coverage. On Friday, October 13, 2017, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Right now NY State is funding construction in areas that have service > because those service providers failed to supply any 477 data at all. > They're also NOT funding construction in places that DON'T have service > because someone touches the census block but doesn't serve everybody. > > IMO, IF they're going to put public money into it, they either need to > require that you only claim census blocks when you serve the entire thing, > or do something more granular than census blocks. I don't know how hard > this is in other states, but I can easily get E911 locations and compare to > where service is available. It takes a trivial amount of time with GIS > software. > > Whether public money should be invested this way at all is a different > question. I'm just saying IF they're going to do it, then census blocks is > not accurate enough. Also, whatever they ask for you should submit it, > otherwise you'll have somebody building on top of you with public money. > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com');>> > To: "af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>" < > af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>> > Sent: 10/13/2017 12:10:50 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Apparently 477 is not enough > > Each street address or household? Are you kidding me? These tech sites are > so misguided as far as ISPs go it is pathetic. > > On Friday, October 13, 2017, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','thatoneguyst...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/10/isps-dont-want-t >> o-tell-the-fcc-exactly-where-they-offer-internet-service/ >> >
