That's a fact.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: 10/13/2017 1:26:58 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Apparently 477 is not enough
It seems a lot less cut and dried with wireless coverage.
On Friday, October 13, 2017, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
Right now NY State is funding construction in areas that have service
because those service providers failed to supply any 477 data at all.
They're also NOT funding construction in places that DON'T have
service because someone touches the census block but doesn't serve
everybody.
IMO, IF they're going to put public money into it, they either need to
require that you only claim census blocks when you serve the entire
thing, or do something more granular than census blocks. I don't know
how hard this is in other states, but I can easily get E911 locations
and compare to where service is available. It takes a trivial amount
of time with GIS software.
Whether public money should be invested this way at all is a different
question. I'm just saying IF they're going to do it, then census
blocks is not accurate enough. Also, whatever they ask for you should
submit it, otherwise you'll have somebody building on top of you with
public money.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: 10/13/2017 12:10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Apparently 477 is not enough
Each street address or household? Are you kidding me? These tech
sites are so misguided as far as ISPs go it is pathetic.
On Friday, October 13, 2017, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
wrote:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/10/isps-dont-want-to-tell-the-fcc-exactly-where-they-offer-internet-service/
<https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/10/isps-dont-want-to-tell-the-fcc-exactly-where-they-offer-internet-service/>
