Managing the Intellectual property, IE code. Now you don't have an easy way to software roll back the customer base in the event of some catastrophic event.
I'd imagine the vast majority of provisioning and configuration is built a certain way, so now you get to hire more people to maintain a different system for dealing with that, causing everybody's costs to go up... Oh and the support nightmare from that. Etc. I'll be honest, I'm going to start deleting these threads. This conversation is toxic as fuck. Simon and crew made an awesome system based on learning a lot of painful lessons from powercode over many years. If you don't like their model, that's fine, but don't fucking bash it until they give you something else... Just move on. On Oct 18, 2017 9:43 AM, "James Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: > I would assume there is not a master database. I would assume a separate > db per customer. And a separate VM per customer. > > Now, we will learn the answer... (right after this word from our sponsor). > > Folks, are you plagued with ugly painful surges on your ethernets? > Dr. Chuck's ethernets surge suppressors are the only known treatment > for this ugly disease. > Don't let the neighbor's kids tease your kids about their dad's > ethernets surges. > Get Dr. Chuck's ethernets surge suppressors today. > Sold at all fine ethernets retailers. > > -----Original Message----- From: Matt Hoppes > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 9:12 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Sonar > > Simon, I guess here's my argument as well. On a locally installed instance > I can firewall the heck out of the server to only my IP address is, and > other various security measures like that. > > If I posted in the cloud on the shared server, I would suspect that has to > be more wide open to the world because you don't know where all people will > be accessing the server is from. Is this a. Incorrect assumption? > > I would also assume that on the cloud system all data is stored in one > master database which if it were hacked for some reason would allow access > to everyone's data as opposed to only a subset on the hacked system. >
