thanks, I just sent out a request to the reseller still interested if there are any other solutions out there similar in cost though
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > with the integra-W in 11GHz you can't do the 2+0 bonding with the OMT (the > W doesn't have the internal switch that does the LAG) for 2+0 you need the > GS and the OMT. > > just call SAF or your favorite bistro to get them to quote the correct > hardware etc. > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> the most i could get on the integra in their calculator is 643, but it >> doesnt have option for 2+0 >> >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> SAF Integra-GS 2+0 >>> >>> http://saftehnika.com/en/integrags >>> >>> -Sean >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:28 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We have a phenomenal saf lumina link we get 366 out of. I can 2+0 this >>>> to get to 732. using the existing 3 and 4 foot antennas >>>> >>>> I wouldnt mind seeing a little more of our gigabit upstream >>>> connectivity utilized here, somewhere along the same price using the same >>>> antennas >>>> >>>> Im not at all impressed with the mimosa gear, its not full duplex and >>>> putting that much variable latency into the network bringing our bandwidth >>>> into the core of our network just seems like moving backward. >>>> >>>> before I give my blessing, for what its worth, to the boss to order the >>>> SAF gear, I just want to make sure there isnt a better option. Lumina is >>>> older and nearing EOL im guessing, we have other places the units can be >>>> used. >>>> >>>> on the same note, we bring this bandwidth up from the fiber by AF24 700 >>>> feet, so probably should ask about a 24ghz (or anything) short link >>>> solution. Im assuming af24hd will meet that need >>>> >>> >> >
