Yeah, but if I'm understanding right, the AF24 link is already there. On Nov 28, 2017 7:10 PM, "Chris Wright" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Everything works beautifully at 700’. At this distance it’s more about > cost savings. Don’t waste your time with AF24 when a 60ghz link at 1/3 the > cost and twice the throughput will fit the bill perfectly. > > > > Chris Wright > > Network Administrator > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 28, 2017 4:59 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 11 mile 11ghz gigabitish > > > > I wouldn't use IgnetNet if I already had the airFibers there... if it's > only going to be feeding an 11ghz link that's around 700ish meg, the AF24 > link will handle that perfectly fine, and I see no reason to mess with it. > > > > Ignitenets should work beautifully on a 700ft link, but if I only needed > 700Mbps, I'd rather have airFibers. If it gets to the point where ~700Mbps > isn't enough, then yes, I'd use IgniteNet. > > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd use IgniteNet over airFiber for 700 feet. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Steve Jones" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Tuesday, November 28, 2017 3:28:11 PM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] 11 mile 11ghz gigabitish > > We have a phenomenal saf lumina link we get 366 out of. I can 2+0 this to > get to 732. using the existing 3 and 4 foot antennas > > > > I wouldnt mind seeing a little more of our gigabit upstream connectivity > utilized here, somewhere along the same price using the same antennas > > > > Im not at all impressed with the mimosa gear, its not full duplex and > putting that much variable latency into the network bringing our bandwidth > into the core of our network just seems like moving backward. > > > > before I give my blessing, for what its worth, to the boss to order the > SAF gear, I just want to make sure there isnt a better option. Lumina is > older and nearing EOL im guessing, we have other places the units can be > used. > > > > on the same note, we bring this bandwidth up from the fiber by AF24 700 > feet, so probably should ask about a 24ghz (or anything) short link > solution. Im assuming af24hd will meet that need > > > > >
