Is this for production model? We rarely have call for to the Fluke certification tester but one of our partners has several for their large projects for schools. We do have Fluke certifiers for our wiring plants so I appreciate the need for a lower cost but reliable version.
Jaime Solorza On Dec 26, 2017 8:27 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yea... Not really the same thing. I am talking certify not map. I am going > to have to do some deep diving into the standards to do it I am sure. For > instance, the most common test that CAT5 fails and CAT6 doesn't is the DB > loss test on my fluke. The pi doesn't do analog so I know I'll need an ADC. > I'll have to take a closer look at my fluke tomorrow and see what all it > tests. > > If I can get past that might be neat to add some stuff like MOS scores or > some such. > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017, 9:15 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=54830 >> >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> On Dec 26, 2017 8:08 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I now have a couple of projects for raspberry pi after my first time >>> success. >>> >>> I was wandering what else might be good. I thought about my 8000 dollar >>> fluke cable certifier and wonder how much of it's functionality could be >>> duplicated by a pair of raspberry pi. >>> >>> I found a project called netpi which is more of a network tester but had >>> some neat stuff. I think it would require a couple of ADC and RTC to do a >>> bunch of the tests that my fluke does off the top of my head just to start >>> with. I am not sure it is even possible, at least by me, but it seems like >>> a worthwhile endeavor if it is possible. I am hoping to get some feedback >>> from the genius pool who know a lot more than I about the low level phy >>> stuff. >>> >>> The goal would be to actually be able to certify a cable, not just pair >>> map and give distance to fault. I know some python but this would likely >>> require many tests to run in something like C for speed I would assume. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>
