Cool Jaime Solorza
On Dec 27, 2017 5:38 AM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, not production. I already own a fluke DTX1800 that does everything I > need a certified to do certified to gig. More of a challenge thing roo see > what it was cost to get it done, how much effort, etc. Then publish it and > make it available for those not able to afford such a tool. > > We use ours all the time. I find I have less trouble when I start out with > certified cables on it VoIP compared to when we just go calling stuff up. > Same when we used to hang AP. Just prevents problems. > > Anyways, just a project that seems worthwhile if reasonably possible. > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017, 9:48 PM Mitch Koep <af...@abwisp.com> wrote: > >> +100 >> >> On 12/26/2017 9:35 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: >> >> Is this for production model? We rarely have call for to the Fluke >> certification tester but one of our partners has several for their large >> projects for schools. We do have Fluke certifiers for our wiring plants so >> I appreciate the need for a lower cost but reliable version. >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> >> On Dec 26, 2017 8:27 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Yea... Not really the same thing. I am talking certify not map. I am >>> going to have to do some deep diving into the standards to do it I am sure. >>> For instance, the most common test that CAT5 fails and CAT6 doesn't is the >>> DB loss test on my fluke. The pi doesn't do analog so I know I'll need an >>> ADC. I'll have to take a closer look at my fluke tomorrow and see what all >>> it tests. >>> >>> If I can get past that might be neat to add some stuff like MOS scores >>> or some such. >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017, 9:15 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=54830 >>>> >>>> >>>> Jaime Solorza >>>> >>>> On Dec 26, 2017 8:08 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I now have a couple of projects for raspberry pi after my first time >>>>> success. >>>>> >>>>> I was wandering what else might be good. I thought about my 8000 >>>>> dollar fluke cable certifier and wonder how much of it's functionality >>>>> could be duplicated by a pair of raspberry pi. >>>>> >>>>> I found a project called netpi which is more of a network tester but >>>>> had some neat stuff. I think it would require a couple of ADC and RTC to >>>>> do >>>>> a bunch of the tests that my fluke does off the top of my head just to >>>>> start with. I am not sure it is even possible, at least by me, but it >>>>> seems >>>>> like a worthwhile endeavor if it is possible. I am hoping to get some >>>>> feedback from the genius pool who know a lot more than I about the low >>>>> level phy stuff. >>>>> >>>>> The goal would be to actually be able to certify a cable, not just >>>>> pair map and give distance to fault. I know some python but this would >>>>> likely require many tests to run in something like C for speed I would >>>>> assume. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>
