We do have an OTT option for those that are interested, no locals and no DVR but a OTT option for the other channels which can be done via VPN.
Layne Sisk ServerPlus 801.426.8283, ext 102 -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 3:24 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RodeoTV vs. RealChoice TV Also. This makes real Choice an IPTV solution not an OTT solution. We need a cost effective OTT solution. > On Feb 23, 2018, at 17:18, Keefe John <keefe...@ethoplex.com> wrote: > > Unless you're getting a short wave most long-distance layer2 connections are > going to be MPLS over layer3 anyways. So how's that different than a VPN or > GRE tunnel? > > Keefe > > >> On 2/23/2018 3:56 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: >> That is not by choice. The content providers all have a different tolerance >> as to how their product is piped around. RealChoice could drop it and >> probably ship the product over the public internet and never get caught, >> however they risk losing channels if they ever get caught. >> >> Not sure what their current deal is, when I was working with them I was >> trying to get the programmers to allow content via VPN or VLAN over VPN >> (silly, right) over the public internet. Some of them were OK with it. >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Matt Hoppes >> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 2:46 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RodeoTV vs. RealChoice TV >> >> RealChoice would be a great option if they would drop their private line >> requirement. >> >>> On Feb 23, 2018, at 15:39, Clint Wiley <cl...@hagerstownfiber.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I wanted to see if any of you are offering IPTV to your customers. If so, >>> are any of you using either RodeoTV or RealChoice TV as the wholesale >>> provider? Can any of you provide feedback, thoughts, experiences, etc. on >>> either provider? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> _________________________ >>> Clint Wiley >>> Hagerstown Fiber Internet >>> >
