Was his MTU a factor?  He would manually have to set it on the router behind 
the PPPoE connection.

The limitation would have evaporated when converted to DHCP.





From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:44 PM
To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT VPN over PPPOE



Yeah Chuck, we went back and forth with Time Warner getting them to open ports 
on router for cameras...upgraded NVR and used vendor platform access to finally 
give manager remote access and monitoring to camp cameras.

Jaime Solorza



On Feb 27, 2018 7:31 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com 
<mailto:lewis.berg...@gmail.com> > wrote:

I think I would tell him to did off. Try getting a credit from quest, att, 
Verizon, etc. Of course I have had some drinks

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018, 4:06 PM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com 
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> > wrote:

Had a customer that works from home.  Could not make his VPN work.

We thought perhaps it was a port issue.  Opened the ports on the Smart RG.  No 
good.



He spend $150 over the weekend on a geek squad type of service and they pointed 
their finger at us.



So, just because we haven’t tried it, we switched him to DHCP and it started 
working.

We are in the process of converting everyone to DHCP.



He wants a credit in the amount of the money he paid the geek squad.



Wonder if it was truly our fault.  Still don’t know why it started working or 
what the problem was.

  _____


Spam 
<https://emailfilteringservice.net/canit/b.php?c=s&i=09Vg2I6gq&m=12edce15c58f&rlm=atcjet-net&t=20180227>
Phish/Fraud 
<https://emailfilteringservice.net/canit/b.php?c=p&i=09Vg2I6gq&m=12edce15c58f&rlm=atcjet-net&t=20180227>
Not spam 
<https://emailfilteringservice.net/canit/b.php?c=n&i=09Vg2I6gq&m=12edce15c58f&rlm=atcjet-net&t=20180227>
Forget previous vote 
<https://emailfilteringservice.net/canit/b.php?c=f&i=09Vg2I6gq&m=12edce15c58f&rlm=atcjet-net&t=20180227>



Reply via email to