I wonder how much speed you could get from a 900 radio that uses the whole 20
MHz. If that was the output of the micropop and you kept distances short and
antenna gains up it would hammer through almost anything. Say 512 QAM. You
could deliver 100 Mbps. Of course you would be claiming a monopoly on the
whole band. Perhaps OFDM might be a better way to go. Use the orthogon method
to occupy as much as you can find.
From: Mathew Howard
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 11:03 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] Re: Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey
Yeah, "under the canopy" doesn't really happen around here, but getting into
the middle of the trees does work in some cases... if we can get a
point-to-point link working to one house in the middle of a subdivision, you
can often get LOS to several other houses and nLOS will sometimes even work
with 5ghz at that kind of range.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Steve D <bigd...@gmail.com> wrote:
And in bands outside of 5GHz as well. I don't think there is such a thing as
"under the canopy" around here. When you're in the trees, you're in the trees.
900 in a lite configuration would be ideal for us.
-Steve D
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:05 AM Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote:
Why not just make a PMP450i lite connectorized AP?
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Matt Mangriotis
<matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote:
> Very good question George…
>
>
>
> I am trying to gauge interest. Some folks would prefer that they are
using
> the same equipment throughout the network, and we don’t really have an
> option right now for a lower priced (shorter range) but high throughput
> extension of the network, but still a 450. Same SMs, etc…
>
>
>
> Really wondering if many folks can’t complete a certain percentage of
> installs due to obstructions (foliage) using 5 GHz, but could utilize an
> “under the canopy” type of solution to light up a neighborhood. Is that a
> really common situation? How common?
>
>
>
> Any feedback is welcome, and I value your guys’ opinions (more than some
> others)…
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of George Skorup
> Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:48 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: [ External ] Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey
>
>
>
> Ok, I guess I have to be the one to say this. Why would we want a
450-based
> micro-POP product when we have ePMP? Just askin'.
>
> On 6/7/2018 10:29 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
>
> I would really like to get your opinions on this topic� would a 450
device
> like this help you in your network?
>
> �
>
> Now�s you chance to comment and help direct us!
>
> �
>
> Please fill out the short survey and add any other info you�d like.�
> It�s only 16 questions.
>
> �
>
> Matt
>
> �
>
> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Ray Savich
> Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:08 AM
> To: 'af@afmug.com' <af@afmug.com>
> Subject [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey
>
> �
>
> Add your input to the Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey.
>
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CambiumMicroPOP
>
> �
>
> �
>
> Join the Conversation
>
> Cambium Networks Community Forum
>
> �
>
>
