Oh, input on 900, yes. Get the guys in Devon to roll a PTP600 in a 900 MHz version.
From: Brian Sullivan Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 11:08 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] Re: Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey A neat product (which we couldn't use around here) would be a 5G 450 AP with 900MHz OFDM PTP built in. Although you would have to use all the available 900Mhz spectrum to make it worthwhile. Perhaps a nLOS 3.65 or LTE PTP combined with 450 AP would work in some areas. On 6/8/2018 12:03 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Yeah, "under the canopy" doesn't really happen around here, but getting into the middle of the trees does work in some cases... if we can get a point-to-point link working to one house in the middle of a subdivision, you can often get LOS to several other houses and nLOS will sometimes even work with 5ghz at that kind of range. On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Steve D <bigd...@gmail.com> wrote: And in bands outside of 5GHz as well. I don't think there is such a thing as "under the canopy" around here. When you're in the trees, you're in the trees. 900 in a lite configuration would be ideal for us. -Steve D On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:05 AM Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: Why not just make a PMP450i lite connectorized AP? On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Matt Mangriotis <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: > Very good question George… > > > > I am trying to gauge interest. Some folks would prefer that they are using > the same equipment throughout the network, and we don’t really have an > option right now for a lower priced (shorter range) but high throughput > extension of the network, but still a 450. Same SMs, etc… > > > > Really wondering if many folks can’t complete a certain percentage of > installs due to obstructions (foliage) using 5 GHz, but could utilize an > “under the canopy” type of solution to light up a neighborhood. Is that a > really common situation? How common? > > > > Any feedback is welcome, and I value your guys’ opinions (more than some > others)… > > > > Matt > > > > From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of George Skorup > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:48 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: [ External ] Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey > > > > Ok, I guess I have to be the one to say this. Why would we want a 450-based > micro-POP product when we have ePMP? Just askin'. > > On 6/7/2018 10:29 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: > > I would really like to get your opinions on this topic� would a 450 device > like this help you in your network? > > � > > Now�s you chance to comment and help direct us! > > � > > Please fill out the short survey and add any other info you�d like.� > It�s only 16 questions. > > � > > Matt > > � > > From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> On Behalf Of Ray Savich > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:08 AM > To: 'af@afmug.com' <af@afmug.com> > Subject [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey > > � > > Add your input to the Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey. > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CambiumMicroPOP > > � > > � > > Join the Conversation > > Cambium Networks Community Forum > > � > >