FYI, this editorial from the Kampala daily, The Monitor, was seen on
AllAfrica.com at http://allafrica.com/stories/200607070396.html . It
takes a skeptical view of the new educational policy in Uganda to
teach in children's first languages for the first 3 years of school.
In particular it claims that this new policy will be negative for
national unity. This is a traditional argument for monolingual
education (in the official language) in Africa, and one that goes back
to a particular concept (born in 18th or 19th century Europe I
believe-?) of what makes a "nation" and language's role in it. 

Personally I think it is a fallacy to say that children learning for 3
years in their first languages in a multilingual society will lead to
disunity of the society. On the other hand, the observations
concerning families moving to different regions of the country, and
what happens to their children, is a point worth considering. As for
the issue of primary school teachers having to teach in their first
language, or another indigenous language they speak fluently, how is
this is a problem?

The alternative of everyone learning (or not) in a second/third
language (English in Uganda) from day-one of primary school has had
serious problems, of course, which is why Uganda (like other
countries) adopted the new policy. However the new approach to
language of primary instruction also does pose some practical
challenges, which this editorial rightly points out. But those are
part of the reality of a multilingual society, not something that can
be resolved by a monolingual education policy. How the country, and
its donor friends concerned with helping expand education for all,
deal creatively with those challenges now in order to make a success
of the new policy seems to be the real issue (from this outsider's
perspective).

I'd be interested in other people's perspectives...

Don Osborn


Uganda: Language Policy Will Promote Sectarianism
The Monitor (Kampala)
http://www.monitor.co.ug/
EDITORIAL
July 7, 2006
Posted to the web July 7, 2006

Kampala

It is now official. Schools will be teaching in vernacular during the
first three years of primary education. This is an official policy and
little can be done about it. Educationists who pushed it did their
studies and concluded that it is the best way to teach the children of
Uganda.

There are however a number of issues which need to be born in mind as
the new policy gets implemented in the next few months.

Any efforts to create a nation called Uganda are going to become
harder because the new policy in a way tends to lock people into their
ethnic communities, rather than opening them up.

To begin with, most children will only be able to attend school
effectively in their tribal districts. If an Acholi with a six-year
old child is posted or transferred to work in Mbarara, he may have to
decline the offer or resist the transfer because his child may not be
able to start school.

If he goes, the child who does not know a word of Runyankore will pick
nothing in Primary One. He will obviously come last in all tests
except may be English which shall only be a subject and not a medium
of instruction.

If the family is then transferred to Teso, the child may go to P2 and
understand nothing the whole year, having missed understanding the
first year and again score zeros. A transfer to Masaka will make the
child go through P3 without picking a thing.

The first time this child will understand the teaching in arithmetic,
science and everything else will be at age nine as he starts P4,
disoriented, frustrated and his esteem shattered.

In short, people with young families will prefer working only in their
tribal districts, further entrenching tribal thinking.

The new policy also condemns primary school teachers to working only
in their tribal districts.

For how will a young Munyankore teacher who has just graduated from a
Teacher Training College work with kids in Moyo?

She would be the object of amusement for the kids; she would be
absolutely ineffective.

So everyone in the teaching profession at that level will remain a
closed tribal teacher, teaching tribally oriented children and look at
the rest of Ugandans as aliens.

Universal Primary Education would not be able to contribute to
national unity. So much for national integration.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.  See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/TpIolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AfricanLanguages/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to