A key feature of the onion I described was to delineate what various
people/entities control, and what controls them.

Then, applying high intelligence, there is some limited ability to reach
into the next outer layer of the onion.

To illustrate, two of my three kids had grabs for exclusive custody by
mothers, CPS, etc. These grabs were easily rebuffed by my kids, whom I had
trained/educated on how to seize control as needed - in effect reaching a
tiny bit into the next layer out in the onion.

Of course there are other more egocentric onions, but I don't (yet?) see
their value, especially in separating the mutable from the immutable.

The one obvious historical example of someone taking limited control of all
but the outermost layer(s) is Mohammad, who effected change by proposing a
better culture (unless you believe that this really came from God via
Gabriel). Now, our present limitations seem to be more cultural than
technological, so yet another new cultural revolution might be the best way
forward, rather than waiting for some future AGI to tell you this same
thing.

Steve

On Jul 22, 2018 6:19 AM, "johojo" <[email protected]> wrote:

Or take a look at this treatment of nested layers of "reality":
http://www.spotops.net/MO/encoding_att'l_focus.pdf
*Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* /
AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2c15e9dba869b3f0-M6dbebd9fb9649a337dc7c5b6>

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2c15e9dba869b3f0-Me00e9ba269df2027a3cb8e3a
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to