Vision and hearing.

On 02.08.2019 04:12, Mohammadreza Alidoust wrote:
Thank you. I really enjoy and appreciate your comments.

There is no universal problem solver. So for the purpose of building a
real AGI, how many problems should our model be able to solve? How big
is our problem space?


On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, 8:22 AM Matt Mahoney <mattmahone...@gmail.com
<mailto:mattmahone...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    The human brain cannot solve every problem. There is no
    requirement for AGI to do so either. Hutter and Legg proved that
    there is no such thing as a universal problem solver or predictor.

    It feels like you could solve any problem given enough effort, but
    that is an illusion. In reality you can't read a 20 digit number
    and recite it back. The human brain is good at solving problems
    that improve reproductive fitness, and that's only because it is
    very complex with thousands of specialized structures and a
    billion bits of inherited knowledge.

    On Wed, Jul 31, 2019, 10:58 PM Mohammadreza Alidoust
    <class.alido...@gmail.com <mailto:class.alido...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        I may not call the model "a reinforcement learning neural
        network", because nothing is going to be reinforced there. I
        would rather call it "model based decision making" where the
        model of the world will be incrementally completed and more
        accurate, which then helps in better decision making.

        The model is in its early stages and must be tested in heavier
        tasks like the ones you mentioned. However, I believe that AGI
        is an infinite problem-space and a real AGI must be able to
        solve everything. This requires further implementations,
        modifications, time, teamwork, financial support, etc.

        On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 1:34 AM Matt Mahoney
        <mattmahone...@gmail.com <mailto:mattmahone...@gmail.com>> wrote:

            Not understanding the math is the reader's problem. It is
            necessary to describe the theory and the experiments and
            shouldn't be omitted.

            The paper describes 3 phases of training a reinforcement
            learning neural network. The first phase is experimenting
            with random actions. The next two phases choose the action
            estimated to maximize reward. They differ in that they use
            explicit and then implicit memory, although the paper
            didn't explain these or other details of the learner.

            I like that the paper has an experimental results section,
            which most papers on AGI lack. But I think calling it a
            "AGI brain" is a stretch. It learns in highly abstract
            models of chemical manufacturing or cattle grazing. It
            doesn't demonstrate actual AGI or solve any major
            components like language or vision.

            On Wed, Jul 31, 2019, 8:01 AM Manuel Korfmann
            <m...@korfmann.info <mailto:m...@korfmann.info>> wrote:

                I guess he meant: It’s difficult to understand all
                these mathematical equations. Visualizations are
                better at transporting ideas in a way that almost
                everyone can understand easily.

                On 31. Jul 2019, at 13:46, Mohammadreza Alidoust
                <class.alido...@gmail.com
                <mailto:class.alido...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                Thank you for reading my paper. I wish you success too.

                Could you please explain more about the readership? I
                am afraid I did not get the point.

                Best regards,
                Mohammadreza Alidoust


                On Tue, Jul 30, 2019, 2:14 PM Stefan Reich via AGI
                <agi@agi.topicbox.com <mailto:agi@agi.topicbox.com>>
                wrote:

                    If someone paid me to go, I'd go... :-)

                    
http://agi-conf.org/2019/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/paper_21.pdf

                    I like the stages you define in your paper
                    (infancy, decision making, expert). Sounds
                    reasonable.

                    I pretty much erased mathematical formulas from
                    my brain though, even though I have studied those
                    things. These days I prefer to think in natural
                    language or code. Increases the readership
                    exponentially too. :-)

                    Many greetings and best wishes to you


                    On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 02:13, Mohammadreza
                    Alidoust <class.alido...@gmail.com
                    <mailto:class.alido...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                        Dear Stefan Reich,

                        Thank you. I do not know whether submitting
                        my paper before official publication by
                        Springer is against their copyrights or not.
                        I am not sure about their rules. I will ask
                        the authorities when I arrived Shenzhen and
                        inform you.

                        However I recommend not to miss the AGI-19.
                        http://agi-conf.org/2019/


                        Best regards,
                        Mohammadreza Alidoust



                    --
                    Stefan Reich
                    BotCompany.de <http://BotCompany.de> //
                    Java-based operating systems


*Artificial General Intelligence List
<https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* / AGI / see discussions
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tf27122c71ce3b240-Mc82055636d6abd2a8d971995>


------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tf27122c71ce3b240-Mc3b5a4edebdce6d4ea99b8b9
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to