No no no, the proposal above was that even when you opt to use the lossy
compressor and decompress to retrieve "2+2=" back (with missing data), this s
like a lot of things in life, employees die and go missing, neurons die, but we
just fill in the cracks anyway. On the global aspect, Earth would fill in or
re-make the whole file some point later in time anyway. Of course for the
Hutter Prize, you'll need an instant, self-contained solution to re-generate
the original data file back. So Lossless Compression is the correct way to
think about the Hutter prize yes, it is local and faster and therefore testable.
But wait global context is faster no? Only near the end of the singularity it
is. The more words/medics/etc the better you can repair something, or IOW
faster. So in the future a human who lost organs (data) can be repaired faster
if we use a lot of doctors instead of 1 doctor, this is same as decompression,
you can have a lossless file and the data is also redundantly around town - or
you can leave pieces missing and the data is still around town, but in this
example case all the doctors are ready and quick....
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T36c83eb0aa31fc55-M2e7793860a1264defec5a638
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
