It'd make sense to me that, if one entry can get 100MB down to 20MB using 32GB,
and another alg can get it to 21MB using 1GB, it's better but but 1MB off and
so unless he can pump it up to 32GB RAM and get it down to 19MB, it's not as
smart. It's all about how smart it talks and the feasibility of getting the
words on your home monitor in time... If the fast guys/low RAM guy's gets worse
compression and can't use 32GB to improve it rawly by more data then it's more
useful to see the smarter words pop up on your monitor in time. Both are
'fast/feasilbe' if you don't notice enough drag personally, and so you end up
just focusing on which talks smarter. Time/RAM don't matter as much. Smarts can
do you a lot more...
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T65747f0622d5047f-M09b90d1e7278991423ccf9ec
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
