On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 9:19 PM Rob Freeman <chaotic.langu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...(Regarding the HNet paper) > The ideas of relational category in that paper might really shift the > needle for current language models. > > That as distinct from the older "grammar of mammalian brain capacity" > paper, which I frankly think is likely a dead end. > Quoting the HNet paper: > We conjecture that ongoing hierarchical construction of > such entities can enable increasingly “symbol-like” repre- > sentations, arising from lower-level “statistic-like” repre- > sentations. Figure 9 illustrates construction of simple “face” > configuration representations, from exemplars constructed > within the CLEVR system consisting of very simple eyes, > nose, mouth features. Categories (¢) and sequential rela- > tions ($) exhibit full compositionality into sequential rela- > tions of categories of sequential relations, etc.; these define > formal grammars (Rodriguez & Granger 2016; Granger > 2020). Exemplars (a,b) and near misses (c,d) are presented, > initially yielding just instances, which are then greatly re- > duced via abductive steps (see Supplemental Figure 13). ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T682a307a763c1ced-Mb30f879a8ccbe35506565e18 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
