On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 2:26 PM Matt Mahoney <mattmahone...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As I explained in my 2013 paper ( https://mattmahoney.net/costofai.pdf The closest you come to a rigorous definition of "knowledge" is Table 2. It would be helpful to be more careful in using that term in statements such as: "Third, it is fundamentally impossible for a program to increase its own knowledge ..." For example, Newtonian mechanics can *compute* "knowledge" derived from collective behaviors like fluid mechanics, without a reductio ad absurdum of a computer the size of the universe. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T11c1e7172d92d3cd-Me8f3739c01c99b55edee8da6 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
