"Semiosis is the performance element involving signs. Although a human can 
communicate many things unintentionally, individuals usually speak or write to 
elicit some kind of response. Yet there is little real explanation of how 
semiosis produces its effects, which is odd given that the word "sign" is in 
everyday use and most people would understand what it means. But semiotics has 
not offered clear technical definitions, nor is there agreement about how signs 
should be classified.
As an insect or animal, human or otherwise, moves through its environment 
(sometimes termed the umwelt), all the senses collect data that are made 
available to the brain. However, to prevent sensory overload, only salient data 
will receive the full attention of the cognitive elements of the mind. This 
indicates that a part of the process must be controlled by a model of the real 
world capable of ranking data elements in terms of their significance and 
filtering out the data irrelevant to survival. A sign cannot function until the 
brain or audience distinguishes it from the background noise. When this 
happens, the sign then triggerscognitive activity to interpret the data input 
and so convert it into meaningful information. This would suggest that, in the 
semiosphere, the process of semiosis goes through the following cycle:The 
plant, insect, or animal with the need to communicate (e.g., to recognise an 
object of food) will know what needs to be said and assess the best means of 
saying it (e.g., starting a searching behaviour);This information will then be 
encoded and relevant muscle groups will effect transmission — although to some 
extent intentional in the human, the actual movements of the body are 
autonomic, i.e. the individual is not aware of moving individual muscles, but 
achieves the desired result by an act of will (see H. L. A. Hart on the nature 
of an action);The audience filters ambient data and perceives the uttered code 
as a grouping of signs;The audience then interprets the signs (sometimes termed 
decoding) to attribute meaning. This involves matching the signs received 
against existing patterns and their meanings held in memory (i.e. it is learned 
and understood within the community). In plants, insects and animals, the 
results of a successful interpretation will be an observable response to the 
stimuli perceived.In biology, scout bees and ants will return home to tell the 
others where food is to be found, the fact of fertility must be announced to 
prospective mates from the same species, and the presence of danger must be 
passed as a warning to others in the group. Such transmission may be chemical, 
auditory, visual, or tactile whether singly or in combination. There is a new 
field of research activity termed biosemiotics, and Jesper Hoffmeyer claims 
that endosymbiosis, self-reference, code duality, the availability of 
receptors, autopoiesis, and others are the general properties of all living 
systems. Thomas Sebeok suggests that a similar list of properties for life may 
coincide with the definition of semiosis, i.e. that the test of whether 
something is alive, is a test to determine whether and how it communicates 
meaning to another of its kind, i.e., whether it has semiosis. This has been 
called the Sebeok's Thesis.For humans, semiosis is an aspect of the wider 
systems of social interaction in which information is exchanged. It can result 
in particular types of social encounter, but the process itself can be 
constrained by social conventions such as propriety, privacy, and disclosure. 
This means that no social encounter is reducible to semiosis alone, and that 
semiosis can only be understood by identifying and exploring all the conditions 
that make the transmission and reception of signs possible and effective. When 
two individuals meet, the ways in which they think, the specific identities 
they assume, the emotional responses they make, and the beliefs, motives, and 
purposes they have, will frame the situation as it develops dynamically and 
potentially test the legitimacy of the outcomes. All these elements are, to a 
greater or lesser extent, semiotic in nature in that prevailing codes and 
values are being applied. Consequently, where the line is drawn between 
semiosis and semiotics will always be somewhat arbitrary."

~ Wikipedia                                                                     
          


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to