On 4/6/13, Piaget Modeler <[email protected]> wrote: > You say you don't like semiotics anyway, so just talk about my definition of > semiosis:computationally linking signs to meanings, and vice versa. > How would you go about it? > ~PM
Not a direct response, but just a note that this reminds me of the well-explored field of "symbolic interactionism" in sociology, the study of how symbols are used to communicate. > > Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 14:39:34 -0400 > Subject: Re: [agi] Semiosis > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > I guess we have a difference of opinion about Semiosis.Jim Bromer > > > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Jim, > You're missing the boat. I'm talking about Semiosis, not Semiotics. > I'm talking about how we link signs to our internal semantic network, > not how we take visual readings of situations (though they are close). > ~PM > > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
