:) But seriously, that's too unruly and all-encompassing an idea for an MVP. Setting aside our different degrees of optimism regarding what can be accomplished within our lifetimes, I'm still of the opinion that even if your ambition is fully human level AGI, there needs to be a more focused MVP objective.
For example, if your primary focus is natural language processing, you might aim for a big chatbot. If your primary focus is robotics, you might aim for a big Roomba. A few years ago I was thinking in terms of a big theorem prover; these days my current idea looks more like a big scripting language interpreter. On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Russell Wallace < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Good questions are useful. How about this one: >> >> ... > >> >> If you are trying to design an AGI, what is your design going to be a big >> version of? >> >> > > > Uhhh... > > Me > > ? > ... > > ;) ben > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/1658954-f53d1a3f> | > Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
