On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The Minimum Viable Product notion has proved itself useful in the domain > of technology-based product development, not groundbreaking research.... > The two domains are pretty different. > Well if you're still doing pure research, fair enough, but I think by the time you start writing code you should have at least a sketch of an MVP in mind. Product-wise, I'm interested in the idea of a robot toddler as a toy .... > This at least feels clearly on the direct path to AGI, to me... > Fair enough! While I'm not optimistic about that being on the direct path to AGI, I think it is a coherent idea for an MVP. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
