I have not seen you be offensive, Boris, and from what I can tell you are not the sort of ... who would be *intentionally *offensive like this jerk.
Azn... you only wish. And since you apparently haven't noticed yet, trash talk doesn't impress anyone. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Boris Kazachenko <[email protected]> wrote: > I am for banning him. Not because he is offensive, - I can be pretty bad > too. And not because he has no clue, - that's common here. It's because he > generates a lot of off-topic traffic, just like Mike Tinter did. > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Azn A <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Mike, thanks for asking. Some day I would like a calendar date to >> celebrate my greatness. What do you think about May 1st? >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Have you ever been on a date, AZN? >>> >>> On 4/22/14, Azn A <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Aaron, I have said nothing more than scientific fact you uneducated >>> luddie. >>> > From an evolutionary perspective, female mate choice should be affected >>> > both by a desire for good genes (where “good” means “likely to >>> reproduce”) >>> > as well as paternal investment in the woman’s children. These need not >>> > coincide; hence some women have affairs with the strongest, smartest, >>> > best-looking man available, while being married to the nicest and most >>> > reliable man available. There is some evidence that women are more >>> > attracted to hypermasculine men when they are ovulating (when good >>> genes >>> > are paramount) and to nice guys when they are not. There is also >>> evidence >>> > that less desirable women are less choosy in terms of the willingness >>> and >>> > ability of a man to provide for her and her children, and hence at >>> least in >>> > relative terms more attracted to dashing qualities than to stable ones. >>> > >>> > Toughness can be attractive for several reasons. One is that it can >>> reflect >>> > overall genetic quality – health, smarts, strength (this would be >>> > especially true in ancestral contexts where the land and money and >>> power >>> > went to the best warrior, not to the smartest lawyer). Another is that >>> it >>> > can protect the woman and her children against rapists, abductors, and >>> so >>> > on. Probably most relevant is that he promises to give her tough sons. >>> A >>> > woman’s son has to compete against other women’s sons, and if he is >>> beaten >>> > up or publicly humiliated or cuckolded or killed, he will have less of >>> a >>> > chance to reproduce. Of course all these have to be traded off against >>> how >>> > good he is to her and her kids, but as mentioned, I predict that most >>> women >>> > would prefer tough-to-others-nice-to-her than tough-to-everyone, though >>> > some may have to settle for the latter as a second choice. >>> > >>> > With that said, we can concluded what has really angered Aaron (and a >>> > number of others) is a hypermasculine black man being here who is also >>> an >>> > intellectual superior. I.e. "And I sure as hell don't consume bodily >>> > fluids" That's disgusting. >>> > >>> > So it's safe to say Aaron's doesn't have a mouth or saliva glands and >>> > doesn't kiss his wife after giving it to her in the can. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> The gavel has fallen. >>> >> >>> >> ~PM >>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------ >>> >> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:16:39 -0500 >>> >> >>> >> Subject: Re: [AGI] Jeff Hawkins says 2014 is the year ! >>> >> From: [email protected] >>> >> To: [email protected] >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> John, sadly, I cannot help that half the list is racist :( Black >>> American >>> >> culture is aggressive and in your face. That's why white women get >>> very >>> >> horny when I'm around. They desire to be taken physically by me and >>> favor >>> >> traits related to resources, intelligence, ambition and >>> industriousness. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I don't know the color of your skin, but I can tell you that >>> regardless, >>> >> this is racist. It's also idiotic. >>> >> >>> >> You have a bunch of asperger geeks talking about their silly numbers >>> and >>> >> brain models who don't even know how to take care of themselves. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> where his autism shields him from recognizing the negatives of >>> drinking >>> >> his own urine and eating dog scat. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I am autistic and you can kiss it. You talk about racism and then in >>> the >>> >> same breath spew the most ridiculous stereotypes I have ever heard, >>> both >>> >> about race and neurotype. Not only do I take care of myself, but I >>> also >>> >> support a comfortable lifestyle for my wife and 7 children, and do my >>> >> research in my spare time. And I sure as hell don't consume bodily >>> fluids >>> >> or excrement! That's disgusting. What is wrong with you? >>> >> >>> >> You talk all this talk about Nietzsche and the will to power, but you >>> >> fail >>> >> to see that by intentionally pissing off everyone you come into >>> contact >>> >> with, you are going to turn yourself into an exile. There is no power >>> >> when >>> >> you are all alone. Right or wrong, you cannot lead when you have made >>> >> sure >>> >> that no one will follow. >>> >> >>> >> *I'm all for banning this jerk.* >>> >> >>> >> Who on this list has he NOT offended yet? *Anybody?* Does *anyone >>> *want >>> >> to put in a good word for him? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Azn A <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> John, sadly, I cannot help that half the list is racist :( Black >>> American >>> >> culture is aggressive and in your face. That's why white women get >>> very >>> >> horny when I'm around. They desire to be taken physically by me and >>> favor >>> >> traits related to resources, intelligence, ambition and >>> industriousness. >>> >> I >>> >> can show you various video clips of this behavior from my home >>> security >>> >> system. >>> >> >>> >> Now on to your comment about substance. I thought this list was about >>> >> A**G***I not narrow **Al** that I can build with my eyes closed? The >>> fact >>> >> is AGI covers just about everything. From math to social shit. Stop >>> >> trying >>> >> to box everything up. That's why we don't have AGI yet. You have a >>> bunch >>> >> of >>> >> asperger geeks talking about their silly numbers and brain models who >>> >> don't >>> >> even know how to take care of themselves. >>> >> >>> >> Do you think building AGI is doable within the next 5 years? NOT >>> without >>> >> my new WEB as I explained. >>> >> >>> >> Or what are your thoughts on a particular AGI architecture. Wait, >>> didn't >>> >> I >>> >> get attacked for this? >>> >> >>> >> Or comment on theory or maybe you might have something to impress us? >>> See >>> >> above. I just invented a whole new way to do research and you're >>> talking >>> >> about the same s...stuff you have been for the past 8 years. How far >>> has >>> >> that gotten you huh? Here's how it goes: some ignorant, introverted >>> pasty >>> >> nerd-type shows up saying he's going to create AGI in his bedroom. >>> After >>> >> a >>> >> few months of trial and error he disappears into a mental hospital or >>> the >>> >> streets of berkeley where his autism shields him from recognizing the >>> >> negatives of drinking his own urine and eating dog scat. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:24 PM, John Rose <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Azn A, >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> A number of people on this list are obviously annoyed with you. I just >>> >> reread some of your posts and saw how abusive you were getting so I >>> >> understand people being offended. Do you have anything of substance >>> worth >>> >> discussing about AGI? Early on it seemed like you did. Is there a way >>> for >>> >> you to prove that you are not a troll because a large percentage of >>> >> people >>> >> here want you banned. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Give us a few sentences of your AGI related insight. To dispel any >>> >> doubts… >>> >> Try not to be insensitive or touch nerves too much. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> For example: Do you think building AGI is doable within the next 5 >>> years? >>> >> Or what are your thoughts on a particular AGI architecture, or >>> comment on >>> >> theory or maybe you might have something to impress us? Going deep >>> into >>> >> politico social analysis is getting a bit strayed. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> What have you got for us to chew on besides flashy sarcasm? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> John >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> *From:* Azn A [mailto:[email protected]] >>> >> >>> >> Indeed, one will go on to change the world. The other will fade away >>> (and >>> >> rightly so). >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:13 PM, just camel <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Yes, fortunately. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 04/08/2014 09:01 PM, Azn A wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I know your position from reading over this list and it's completely >>> >> different from my thinking :) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >>> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10514698-9a8cda1e> | >>> >> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >>> >> <http://www.listbox.com> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >>> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23050605-2da819ff> | >>> >> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >>> >> <http://www.listbox.com> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >>> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/19999924-4a978ccc> | >>> >> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >>> >> <http://www.listbox.com> >>> >> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >>> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10514698-9a8cda1e> | >>> >> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription >>> >> <http://www.listbox.com> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------- >>> > AGI >>> > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now >>> > RSS Feed: >>> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae >>> > Modify Your Subscription: >>> > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; >>> > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com >>> > >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------- >>> AGI >>> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now >>> RSS Feed: >>> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10514698-9a8cda1e >>> >>> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; >>> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com >>> >> >> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/18407320-d9907b69> | >> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription >> <http://www.listbox.com> >> > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23050605-2da819ff> | > Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
