Don’t be concerned with this Azn still receives email from the list but his posts are held for review. This list after many years still has < 10 denied posters. Too permissive perhaps...
I actually can’t bear to read some of these emails in full so I don’t know how offensive he got. Is it really worth wasting time on after you hit a couple of those trigger keywords? But I do know unfortunately that there are some types of speech that need to be censored and punished. I’m very pro free speech but there are definitely hard limits… Azn please send me an email and I will make an effort to counsel you on this. BTW this list is mostly self-moderated though we do need a way to communally control these situations I actually was working on a software spec for that... Boy we did some serious damage to this subject line didn’t we? - “RE: [AGI] Jeff Hawkins says 2014 is the year !” Sorry Jeff. John From: Boris Kazachenko [mailto:[email protected]] I am for banning him. Not because he is offensive, - I can be pretty bad too. And not because he has no clue, - that's common here. It's because he generates a lot of off-topic traffic, just like Mike Tinter did. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Azn A <[email protected]> wrote: Mike, thanks for asking. Some day I would like a calendar date to celebrate my greatness. What do you think about May 1st? On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote: Have you ever been on a date, AZN? On 4/22/14, Azn A <[email protected]> wrote: > Aaron, I have said nothing more than scientific fact you uneducated luddie. > From an evolutionary perspective, female mate choice should be affected > both by a desire for good genes (where “good” means “likely to reproduce”) > as well as paternal investment in the woman’s children. These need not > coincide; hence some women have affairs with the strongest, smartest, > best-looking man available, while being married to the nicest and most > reliable man available. There is some evidence that women are more > attracted to hypermasculine men when they are ovulating (when good genes > are paramount) and to nice guys when they are not. There is also evidence > that less desirable women are less choosy in terms of the willingness and > ability of a man to provide for her and her children, and hence at least in > relative terms more attracted to dashing qualities than to stable ones. > > Toughness can be attractive for several reasons. One is that it can reflect > overall genetic quality – health, smarts, strength (this would be > especially true in ancestral contexts where the land and money and power > went to the best warrior, not to the smartest lawyer). Another is that it > can protect the woman and her children against rapists, abductors, and so > on. Probably most relevant is that he promises to give her tough sons. A > woman’s son has to compete against other women’s sons, and if he is beaten > up or publicly humiliated or cuckolded or killed, he will have less of a > chance to reproduce. Of course all these have to be traded off against how > good he is to her and her kids, but as mentioned, I predict that most women > would prefer tough-to-others-nice-to-her than tough-to-everyone, though > some may have to settle for the latter as a second choice. > > With that said, we can concluded what has really angered Aaron (and a > number of others) is a hypermasculine black man being here who is also an > intellectual superior. I.e. "And I sure as hell don't consume bodily > fluids" That's disgusting. > > So it's safe to say Aaron's doesn't have a mouth or saliva glands and > doesn't kiss his wife after giving it to her in the can. > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The gavel has fallen. >> >> ~PM >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:16:39 -0500 >> >> Subject: Re: [AGI] Jeff Hawkins says 2014 is the year ! >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> John, sadly, I cannot help that half the list is racist :( Black American >> culture is aggressive and in your face. That's why white women get very >> horny when I'm around. They desire to be taken physically by me and favor >> traits related to resources, intelligence, ambition and industriousness. >> >> >> I don't know the color of your skin, but I can tell you that regardless, >> this is racist. It's also idiotic. >> >> You have a bunch of asperger geeks talking about their silly numbers and >> brain models who don't even know how to take care of themselves. >> >> >> where his autism shields him from recognizing the negatives of drinking >> his own urine and eating dog scat. >> >> >> I am autistic and you can kiss it. You talk about racism and then in the >> same breath spew the most ridiculous stereotypes I have ever heard, both >> about race and neurotype. Not only do I take care of myself, but I also >> support a comfortable lifestyle for my wife and 7 children, and do my >> research in my spare time. And I sure as hell don't consume bodily fluids >> or excrement! That's disgusting. What is wrong with you? >> >> You talk all this talk about Nietzsche and the will to power, but you >> fail >> to see that by intentionally pissing off everyone you come into contact >> with, you are going to turn yourself into an exile. There is no power >> when >> you are all alone. Right or wrong, you cannot lead when you have made >> sure >> that no one will follow. >> >> *I'm all for banning this jerk.* >> >> Who on this list has he NOT offended yet? *Anybody?* Does *anyone *want >> to put in a good word for him? >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Azn A <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> John, sadly, I cannot help that half the list is racist :( Black American >> culture is aggressive and in your face. That's why white women get very >> horny when I'm around. They desire to be taken physically by me and favor >> traits related to resources, intelligence, ambition and industriousness. >> I >> can show you various video clips of this behavior from my home security >> system. >> >> Now on to your comment about substance. I thought this list was about >> A**G***I not narrow **Al** that I can build with my eyes closed? The fact >> is AGI covers just about everything. From math to social shit. Stop >> trying >> to box everything up. That's why we don't have AGI yet. You have a bunch >> of >> asperger geeks talking about their silly numbers and brain models who >> don't >> even know how to take care of themselves. >> >> Do you think building AGI is doable within the next 5 years? NOT without >> my new WEB as I explained. >> >> Or what are your thoughts on a particular AGI architecture. Wait, didn't >> I >> get attacked for this? >> >> Or comment on theory or maybe you might have something to impress us? See >> above. I just invented a whole new way to do research and you're talking >> about the same s...stuff you have been for the past 8 years. How far has >> that gotten you huh? Here's how it goes: some ignorant, introverted pasty >> nerd-type shows up saying he's going to create AGI in his bedroom. After >> a >> few months of trial and error he disappears into a mental hospital or the >> streets of berkeley where his autism shields him from recognizing the >> negatives of drinking his own urine and eating dog scat. >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:24 PM, John Rose <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Azn A, >> >> >> >> A number of people on this list are obviously annoyed with you. I just >> reread some of your posts and saw how abusive you were getting so I >> understand people being offended. Do you have anything of substance worth >> discussing about AGI? Early on it seemed like you did. Is there a way for >> you to prove that you are not a troll because a large percentage of >> people >> here want you banned. >> >> >> >> Give us a few sentences of your AGI related insight. To dispel any >> doubts… >> Try not to be insensitive or touch nerves too much. >> >> >> >> For example: Do you think building AGI is doable within the next 5 years? >> Or what are your thoughts on a particular AGI architecture, or comment on >> theory or maybe you might have something to impress us? Going deep into >> politico social analysis is getting a bit strayed. >> >> >> >> What have you got for us to chew on besides flashy sarcasm? >> >> >> >> John >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Azn A [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> Indeed, one will go on to change the world. The other will fade away (and >> rightly so). >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:13 PM, just camel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yes, fortunately. >> >> >> >> On 04/08/2014 09:01 PM, Azn A wrote: >> >> I know your position from reading over this list and it's completely >> different from my thinking :) >> >> ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
