Your use of the words "read" and "write" and "know" is a bit too far stretched, IMO.
By your definitions, MS-Word is also a strong AI, due to its spell-checker and grammar-checker and document summarizer... no? -- Ben > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Dennis Gorelik > Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 11:52 PM > To: Ben Goertzel > Subject: [agi] Google as a strong AI > > > > If you think Google is "strong AI" then we have really > different definitions > > of that term, what can I say... > > > Google is narrow AI, if it's AI at all. It's great, of course.. but ... > > > Ok, let's see: > 1) Google reads Natural Language. Every natural language. > Google write Natural Language. > 2) Google constantly learns. Learning affects Google behavior. > 3) Google knows words and phrases. Google distinguishes between usual > and unusual (wrong/misspelled/...) words. > 4) Google's memory is implemented in form of dynamic Neural Net. > 5) Google has huge memory. > > Now, it's your turn: what program is a better implementation of strong > AI than Google? > > > > ------- > To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate > your subscription, > please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
