The interpretation of probability is a different matter --- we have
been talking about consistency, which is largely independent to which
interpretation you subscribe to.
Correct
In my opinion, in the AGI context, each of the three traditional
interpretation is partly applicable but partly not. The subjectivist
is not better in general.
As you know I feel differently. I think the traditional subjectivist
interpretation is
conceptually well-founded as far as it goes, but incomplete (not
dealing e.g. with
the multiple components of truth value), whereas the traditional
frequentist
interpretation is conceptually confused...
But, I definitely don't think these interpretation-of-probability
issues are
the bottlenecks on the path to AGI...
ben
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
