On 3/23/07, rooftop8000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Suppose there was an AGI framework that everyone could add
their ideas to.. What properties should it have? I listed
some points below. What would it take for
you to use the framework? You can add points if you like.
I don't understand. Is the hypothesis that if we have enough people
writing and contributing AI modules according to their conception of
intelligence, and we wire up the modules up to each other, then AGI
will {result, emerge, pop out}? This doesn't sound like a feasible
approach. And, if there isn't a coherent picture of how the modules
are supposed to interact, how can you choose the design of
infrastructure like the language, organization, and knowledge base?
This seems backwards, to choose a design for the infrastructure then
fit an AGI design to the infrastructure. It's analogous to "I don't
know to build a house, but I know I want to use a sledgehammer to do
it." :-)
-Jey Kottalam
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
