So, in the "real" context of an AGI, you make her responsible for
talking to you in this simplified language, which just pushes language
understanding under her carpet ;-)
(joking here)
ASSERT("Lukasz Stafiniak", Evil)
So . . . . if I get NLP working, does this mean that I have AGI or just a
subset?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lukasz Stafiniak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <agi@v2.listbox.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] rule-based NL system
On 4/28/07, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are right that NLP implies the processing of world-view, I just
> remind that general world-view management should be outsourced to the
> AGI core.
I agree. My mental separation is that the NLP "module" simply consists
of
the parser and the generator but that they absolutely require the
contents
of (i.e. some form of access or calls to) the knowledge base/world model.
HOWEVER, in order to make NLP easier, I am making some very important
assumptions about the view of the knowledge base/world model that the NLP
module is using -- which then leads to a number of seriously simplifying
assumptions.
So, in the "real" context of an AGI, you make her responsible for
talking to you in this simplified language, which just pushes language
understanding under her carpet ;-)
(joking here)
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
