On 6/12/07, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


>> a question is whether a software program could tractably learn language
without such associations, by relying solely on statistical associations
within texts.

Isn't there an alternative (or middle ground) of starting the software
program with a seed of initial structure and then letting it grow from there
(rather than relying only on statistical associations -- which I believe
will be intractable for quite some time).

It is at least conceivable. The idea is that you give the system
reasonable means to build models (= simulations). The "initial
structure" lets the system build approximate models to at least some
minimal but not isolated amount of texts. The system then should have
some explorative means to build new more complicated models (the hard
part). The model extension should be guided by parts of (partially or
approxiamtely) interpretable texts that "do not quite fit" (e.g. have
uninterpreted words). The extensions are then evaluated by their
"predictive" characteristics (how much new text can be consistently
interpreted in them).

Also, have a look at Polyscheme, etc.

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=e9e40a7e

Reply via email to