Beyond AI pp 253-256, 339. I've written a few thousand words on the subject, myself.
a) the most likely sources of AI are corporate or military labs, and not just US ones. No friendly AI here, but profit-making and "mission-performing" AI. b) the only people in the field who even claim to be interested in building friendly AI (SIAI) aren't even actually building anything. c) of all the people at the AGI conf last year who were trying to build AGI, none of them had any idea how to make it friendly or even any coherent idea what friendliness might really mean. Yet they're all building away. d) same can be said of the somewhat wider group of builders on this mailing list. In other words, nobody knows what "friendly" really means, nobody's really trying to build a friendly AI, and more people are seriously trying to build an AGI every time I look. Who could seriously think that ALL AGIs will then be built to be friendly? Josh On Tuesday 02 October 2007 11:46:32 am, Richard Loosemore wrote: > J Storrs Hall, PhD wrote: > > On Tuesday 02 October 2007 10:17:42 am, Richard Loosemore wrote: > >> ... Since the AGIs are all built to be friendly, ... > > > > The probability that this will happen is approximately the same as the > > probability that the Sun could suddenly quantum-tunnel itself to a new > > position inside the perfume department of Bloomingdales. > > Justification for this statement? > > [Hey, I've been backing up my statements! That one was there because of > several thousand words of backup in earlier posts. No fair taking stuff > out of context]. > > > Richard Loosemore > > ----- > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&; > > ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=48933113-7181d7
