On 2/28/08, William Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to try and elucidate my approach to building an intelligent > system, in a round about fashion. This is the problem I am trying to > solve. > > Imagine you are designing a computer system to solve an unknown > problem, and you have these constraints > > A) Limited space to put general information about the world > B) Communication with the system after it has been deployed. The less > the better. > C) We shall also assume limited processing ability etc > > The goal is to create a system that can solve the tasks as quickly as > possible with the least interference from the outside. > > I'd like people to write a brief sketch of your solution to this sort > of problem down. Is it different from your AGI designs, if so why?
Space/time-optimality is not my top concern. I'm focused on building an AGI that *works*, within reasonable space/time. If you add these contraints, you're making the AGI problem harder than it already is. Ditto for the amount of user interaction. Why make it harder? > System Sketch? -> It would have to be generally programmable, I would > want to be able to send it arbitrary programs after it had been > created, so I could send it a program to decrypt things or control > things. It would also need to able to generate it's own programming > and select between the different programs in order to minimise my need > to program it. It is not different to my AGI design, unsurprisingly. Generally programmable, yes. But that's very broad. Many systems have this property. Even system with only a declarative KB can re-program itself by modifying the KB. YKY ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com