agi
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: [agi] Professor Asim Roy Finally Publishes Controversial Brain Theory
Vladimir Nesov
[agi] PhD study opportunity at Temple University
Pei Wang
[agi] Special Issue of Neurocomputing on Brain Building: Call for papers
Ben Goertzel
[agi] Neurogenesis critical to mammalian learning and memory?
Ben Goertzel
RE: [agi] Neurogenesis critical to mammalian learning and memory?
Ed Porter
[agi] AGI Light Humor - first words
Stan Nilsen
[agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Steve Richfield
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
martin biehl
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Steve Richfield
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Steve Richfield
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Steve Richfield
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Bob Mottram
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Trent Waddington
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Steve Richfield
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Steve Richfield
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
BillK
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Steve Richfield
RE: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Benjamin Johnston
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Matt Mahoney
Re: **SPAM** Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Mark Waser
Re: **SPAM** Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Steve Richfield
Definition of pain (was Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...)
Matt Mahoney
Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...
Daniel Yokomizo
Seed AI (was Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...)
Matt Mahoney
Re: Seed AI (was Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...)
Ben Goertzel
Re: Seed AI (was Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...)
Daniel Yokomizo
Re: Seed AI (was Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...)
Steve Richfield
Re: Seed AI (was Re: [agi] My prospective plan to neutralize AGI and other dangerous technologies...)
Matt Mahoney
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Matt Mahoney
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Mark Waser
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Matt Mahoney
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Mark Waser
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Matt Mahoney
RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Ed Porter
RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Matt Mahoney
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Trent Waddington
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Eric Burton
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Matt Mahoney
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Matt Mahoney
RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
John G. Rose
RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Ed Porter
RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Matt Mahoney
RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Ed Porter
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Trent Waddington
RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Ed Porter
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Trent Waddington
RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Ed Porter
RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Matt Mahoney
RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Ed Porter
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Mike Tintner
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Mark Waser
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Matt Mahoney
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction
Mark Waser
Definition of pain (was Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction)
Matt Mahoney
Re: Definition of pain (was Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction)
Ben Goertzel
Re: Definition of pain (was Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction)
Trent Waddington
Re: Definition of pain (was Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction)
Jiri Jelinek
Re: Definition of pain (was Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction)
Trent Waddington
Re: Definition of pain (was Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction)
Jiri Jelinek
Re: Definition of pain (was Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction)
Matt Mahoney
Re: Definition of pain (was Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction)
Matt Mahoney
Re: Definition of pain (was Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction)
Mark Waser
Re: Definition of pain (was Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness--correction)
Mark Waser
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Matt Mahoney
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Colin Hales
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Mike Tintner
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Matt Mahoney
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Mark Waser
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Colin Hales
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Colin Hales
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Mike Tintner
[agi] Now hear this: Human qualia are generated in the human cranial CNS and no place else
Colin Hales
Re: [agi] Now hear this: Human qualia are generated in the human cranial CNS and no place else
Mike Tintner
Re: [agi] Now hear this: Human qualia are generated in the human cranial CNS and no place else
Trent Waddington
Re: [agi] Now hear this: Human qualia are generated in the human cranial CNS and no place else
Colin Hales
Re: [agi] Now hear this: Human qualia are generated in the human cranial CNS and no place else
Trent Waddington
Re: [agi] Now hear this: Human qualia are generated in the human cranial CNS and no place else
Colin Hales
Re: [agi] Now hear this: Human qualia are generated in the human cranial CNS and no place else
Mike Tintner
Re: [agi] Now hear this: Human qualia are generated in the human cranial CNS and no place else
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Mike Tintner
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Richard Loosemore
RE: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ed Porter
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Trent Waddington
RE: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
John G. Rose
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Trent Waddington
Zombies, Autism and Consciousness {WAS Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness]
Richard Loosemore
Dan Dennett [WAS Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness]
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Mike Tintner
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Mike Tintner
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Vladimir Nesov
[agi] MSRobot vs E3
Mike Tintner
Re: [agi] MSRobot vs E3
Bob Mottram
Re: [agi] MSRobot vs E3
Charles Hixson
Re: [agi] MSRobot vs E3
Bob Mottram
[agi] Funding Problems?
Mike Tintner
Re: [agi] Funding Problems?
Bob Mottram
RE: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ed Porter
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
RE: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ed Porter
RE: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
wannabe
RE: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ed Porter
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Eric Burton
RE: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ed Porter
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
RE: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ed Porter
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Eric Burton
RE: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ed Porter
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Eric Burton
Re: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Mike Tintner
Re: [agi] To what extent can our minds experience the consciousness of external reality?
Ben Goertzel
RE: [agi] To what extent can our minds experience the consciousness of external reality?
Ed Porter
Re: [agi] To what extent can our minds experience the consciousness of external reality?
Ben Goertzel
RE: [agi] To what extent can our minds experience the consciousness of external reality?
Ed Porter
Re: [agi] To what extent can our minds experience the consciousness of external reality?
Harry Chesley
RE: [agi] To what extent can our minds experience the consciousness of external reality?
Ed Porter
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
RE: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ed Porter
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Hector Zenil
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Hector Zenil
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Hector Zenil
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Hector Zenil
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Hector Zenil
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Hector Zenil
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Charles Hixson
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Philip Hunt
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
RE: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ed Porter
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
J. Andrew Rogers
RE: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ed Porter
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Hector Zenil
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Hector Zenil
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Hector Zenil
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Ben Goertzel
[agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Harry Chesley
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Philip Hunt
RE: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ed Porter
RE: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Terren Suydam
RE: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ed Porter
RE: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Terren Suydam
RE: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ed Porter
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ben Goertzel
RE: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ed Porter
RE: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Terren Suydam
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Philip Hunt
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Terren Suydam
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Terren Suydam
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Richard Loosemore
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Terren Suydam
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Richard Loosemore
RE: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ed Porter
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Terren Suydam
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Terren Suydam
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Matt Mahoney
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Ben Goertzel
Re: [agi] Lamarck Lives!(?)
Matt Mahoney
Re: >> RE: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Trent Waddington
Re: FW: [agi] A paper that actually does solve the problem of consciousness
Eric Burton
Re: [agi] Chaogate chips: Yum!
Olie Lamb
Re: [agi] Chaogate chips: Yum!
Eric Burton
[agi] probabilistic learning of programs now open-source
Moshe Looks
Re: [agi] probabilistic learning of programs now open-source
Abram Demski
[agi] Dilbert on Singularity
Dennis Gorelik
Earlier messages
Later messages