On 2/28/08, William Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note I want something different than computational universality. E.g. > Von Neumann architectures are generally programmable, Harvard > architectures aren't. As they can't be reprogrammed at run time.
It seems that you want to build the AGI from the "programming" level. This is in contrast to John MacCarthy's "declarative" paradigm. Your approach offers more flexibility (perhaps maximum flexibility), but may not make AGI easier to build. Learning, in your case, is a matter of algorithmic learning. It may be harder / less efficient than logic-based learning. YKY ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
