On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In the past I have argued strenuously that (a) you cannot divorce a > discussion of friendliness from a discussion of what design of AGI you > are talking about, and (b) some assumptions about AGI motivation are > extremely incoherent. > > And yet in spite of all my efforts that I have made, there seems to be > no acknowledgement of the importance of these two points. >
Would it be so easy to reliably transfer semitechnical understanding, and better yet to check its rationality... -- Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
